Everyone
talks about the weather, yet nothing is done about it.
– Mark Twain
In the
interest of spreading weather knowledge, I plan to write about
the forecasting tools I use and my experience with the
results. This may
turn into a regular column, depending on whether others find
it useful, and I invite other BASA members to write about
their own experiences trying to forecast soaring conditions.
Forecasting
Tools. If you are not already using the Dr. Jack weather products,
you need to be. These
represent a huge leap ahead in forecasting of thermal soaring
conditions. Go to www.drjack.net to
access the BLIPMAPs, BLIPs and TIPs.
You can also sign up on the Soar Hollister website to
have the Hollister TIP forecast automatically e-mailed to you
every morning. “Dr.
Jack” is Jack Glendening, a local soaring pilot and research
meteorologist. Jack
described the BLIPMAPs and related tools in the July, 2002
issue of Soaring magazine.
There are further explanations on the drjack website.
Here is a summary of what these products tell you, and
how I use them:
The BLIPMAPs
and BLIPs result from taking numerical meteorological model
outputs produced by the NOAA, downloading them to Jack’s
computer and reprocessing the numbers to get forecast
parameters relevant to soaring pilots.
BLIPMAPs and BLIPs for each day are usually available
beginning about 6:30 PM PDT the evening before.
Updated forecasts are produced periodically through the
night and morning, so it is worth checking the BLIPMAPs and
BLIPs again in the morning.
Both the
BLIPMAPs and BLIPs use the same methodology, but present the
results in different formats.
BLIPMAPs are color-coded maps showing forecast
conditions over all of California and Nevada (with other maps
for other regions of the US), at a single time (21:00 Zulu
time for the California – Nevada maps).
BLIPs are forecasts of the same parameters, but for
specific locations, and for different times over the course of
the day. We are
fortunate that Jack flies at Hollister, because his website
includes daily BLIP forecasts for Hollister, Quien Sabe,
Panoche, Hernandez, Black Mountain (the high ridge west of
Avenal), and Avenal. In
the mountains, BLIPs are produced for Truckee, Minden and
Mount Patterson.
For me, the
most important parameters in the BLIPMAPs and BLIPs are the
“BL Top” and “Hcrit” numbers.
“Hcrit” represents the highest predicted thermaling
height over flat terrain.
The “BL Top” is a good estimate of the highest
thermaling height over mountains and ridges.
The correlation has been remarkable between the
forecast BL Top for Panoche and Hernandez and the actual
thermaling heights at the Panoche and Hernandez
“elevators”. More
often than not, the forecast
BL Top is within 1,000 feet of the actual thermaling
heights achieved. These
forecasts do not take into account the effects of cumulus
clouds, so on days that clouds are present the actual
thermaling height may be lower (because cloudbase is lower),
or higher (because condensation releases heat, propelling the
thermal higher).
There is a
lot of other information in the BLIPs, including a forecast of
winds aloft at increments of approximately 200 feet.
For flights to Panoche and back, these usually confirm
that the summer seabreeze doesn’t extend above a few
thousand feet.
The Hollister
BLIP is less reliable than those for other locations, probably
because of the marine influence. As we get into winter and get more post-frontal days, the
BLIP and BLIPMAP will probably do a better job of forecasting
local conditions at Hollister.
The Quien Sabe BLIP does a pretty good job of
forecasting conditions over the east ridge of the Quien Sabe
valley, and reported thermal heights there the last two months
were often between the forecast Hcrit and BL Top heights.
TIPs are much
less accurate than BLIPs and BLIPMAPs, but they include
forecasts for the current day and the next two days.
I use TIPs mainly for trend analysis – i.e., will
conditions improve or worsen over the next few days?
Other
resources are available on the National Weather Service
websites. My
starting point is usually the forecast page of the Monterey
office, at http://www.wrh.noaa.gov/Monterey/forecast.html.
The Zone Forecast gives you the basic weather forecast
over the next five to seven days, while the Forecast
Discussion gives the reasoning behind the forecasts. It takes some time to get used to the jargon used in the
Forecast Discussion, but it is worthwhile to read these
regularly. There
is a link on the main forecast page to a glossary of terms
used. The
Forecast Discussion is the place to find out whether a ridge
or trough is forecast to move in aloft, when an offshore flow
is predicted, and other general trends.
I also like
the NWS aviation weather page, at http://www.wrh.noaa.gov/Monterey/aviation.html.
This has links to METARs for current conditions, Winds
Aloft forecasts, and TAF and TWEB forecasts.
The Salinas TAF gives the closest aviation forecast to
Hollister. During
post-frontal conditions in the winter and spring, it is often
a good forecast of the cloudbase at Hollister, allowing that
the Hollister cloudbase may be 500 feet or so higher than the
Salinas cloudbase. The
TWEB en-route forecast for San Jose to Bakersfield (#421)
gives the forecast cloudbase over the east hills and the
Panoche area.
To see how
the forecasts match with reality, I regularly consult the
satellite photos at http://www.wrh.noaa.gov/satellite/1km/Monterey/VIS1MTR.GIF
and http://www.wrh.noaa.gov/satellite/1km/Reno/VIS1RNO.GIF.
In the winter, you can watch wave clouds forming over
Hollister on a stormy day, and then marching south to Avenal
and beyond as the front moves through.
In the spring, the photos show cloudstreets forming
over the Panoche / Hernandez area, and in the summer you can
see the thunderstorms building over the Sierra and into
Nevada.
Recent
Soaring Conditions at Hollister.
September and early October provided many good days of
soaring in the hills east of Hollister, as well as south into
the Panoche and Hernandez area.
I noticed three kinds of days with good conditions:
1.
The best cross-country days were generally when the
Forecast Discussion predicted a strong high-pressure ridge
building aloft over a period of several days.
Temperatures at King City, Los Banos and Coalinga were
forecast to climb into the 90s or even low 100s, but an
afternoon seabreeze was still forecast for the coast.
These days provided the usual strong blue thermals at
Panoche, but the seabreeze washed out any local thermals at
Hollister. There were often good conditions over the hills around
Henrietta and on the east side of the Quien Sabe Valley,
however, allowing long-duration flights within gliding
distance of Hollister.
2.
As we got into late September and early October, the
high-pressure events were accompanied by an offshore flow
reaching all the way to the coast.
Temperatures inland were not as hot as before, and
temperatures on the coast were almost as hot as those inland.
The flow aloft was forecast to come out of the
northeast, and no seabreeze was predicted.
These days had usable thermals right at Hollister.
Strong thermals were found in the hills, but not at the
usual locations, the best lift generally being further west
than normal.
3.
In between the high-pressure events, upper-level
troughs would swing through, bringing in cooler air aloft.
Some of these troughs were completely dry, but others
had enough moisture that partly-cloudy conditions were
forecast. The
best of these troughs came through in early September, and
resulted in a lovely cloud street stretching from north of
Panoche to south of Hernandez, which Tom Hubbard was able to
follow for a 300 km flight.
So, read the
Forecast Discussions regularly to see what is coming a few
days out. In the
late spring and early fall, a forecast of a ridge building
aloft usually means strong blue thermals over the hills east
and south of Hollister. As
we get into the rainy season, the Forecast Discussion will
help you predict when fronts will pass, and whether they will
produce strong winds for wave conditions.
Harry Fox